Archive for the ‘Research Investment/Funding’ Category

Biden, White House Release Report Touting Recovery Act’s Impact

Wednesday, August 25th, 2010

Vice President Joe Biden released a report on Tuesday that noted that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act has put the U.S. on track to achieve four major breakthroughs, including one pertaining to health and medical science.

The report, titled “The Recovery Act: Transforming the American Economy through Innovation,” (PDF) states that within five years, advances will allow scientists to create a personal human genome map for under $1,000. That would allow researchers to map 50 human genomes for the same cost as one human genome costs today.

The other breakthroughs that the report expects: cutting the cost of solar power in half by 2015; cutting the cost of batteries for electric cars by 70% between 2009 and 2015; and doubling the country’s renewable energy generation capacity and renewable manufacturing capacity by 2012.

Of the $10 billion allocated to the National Institutes of Health through ARRA, the report states that 82% of the money went to scientific research; the rest paid for construction, improvements and repair at the NIH in Bethesda, MD, and at NIH-funded facilities across the nation, as well as equipment purchases for NIH-funded institutions.

With part of that $8.2 billion, the NIH will be able to sequence more than 1,800 complete human genomes – a significant jump from the 34 complete genomes that the NIH has already completed. Moreover, another portion of that money was dedicated to lowering the cost of sequencing a human genome. Pacific Biosciences in Menlo, CA, developed a technology called Single-Molecule Real-Time DNA sequencing, or SMRT; a commercially viable SMRT could drastically reduce the cost of genome sequencing, the report states.

The report adds that genome sequencing could have big roles in understanding cardiovascular disease and autism spectrum disorder as well as adding to the base of knowledge of the Cancer Genome Atlas Project.

The Scientist’s 2010 Best Places to Work

Monday, July 26th, 2010

In the July issue of The Scientist, the magazine published its list of best places to work in academia.

From the farmlands of France to the rust-colored post-industrial cities of Michigan, this year’s top institutions are finding good science in some rather unusual places.

Research!America’s findings about research funding by state were cited in the article, specifically about research investment in Michigan.

While the auto industry may be in dire straights, Michigan is working towards making itself a top location for research, with over $1.1 billion dollars in federal research funding for 2009 according to Research!America.

The list of best places to work includes many Research!America members. See the full list and read more: Best Places to Work Academia 2010 – The Scientist – Magazine of the Life Sciences

Consortion of Food Allergy Research Expanded

Monday, July 19th, 2010

The Consortium of Food Allergy Research, will be funded for five more years with a $29.9 million grant, the National Institutes of Health announced today.

Established in 2005, CoFAR fosters new approaches to food allergy prevention and treatment. The new funding will expand its scope to include research on the genetic causes of food allergy and related diseases.

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases fund CoFAR.

In a press release, NIAID Director Anthony S. Fauci, MD, said, “Food allergies are difficult to manage because even when one strictly avoids allergenic foods, people with food allergies are still at risk of potentially life-threatening accidental exposures. We need to find better ways to treat and prevent food allergy and improve the quality of life of those with the disease.”

Research!America has produced a fact sheet focused on food allergy research (PDF) as part of our Investment in Research Saves Lives and Money series. The bottom line: “Food allergies are a growing health problem in the United States for which there is no cure. To help the increasing number of Americans with food allergies, greater investment in research to understand, treat and prevent food allergies is needed now.”

For more information about food allergy, visit the NIAID Food Allergy website.

Symposium Encourages New Collaboration in Biomedical Research

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

Numerous medical organizations came together July 7 for “The New Role of Academia in Drug Development: New Thinking, New Competencies, New Results” symposium in Kansas City, OH, including the University of Kansas Cancer Center, which is affiliated with Research!America member University of Kansas Medical Center, Friends of Cancer Research, Kansas Bioscience Authority, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and Council for American Medical Innovation.

At this gathering of leaders from the public and private sectors, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius discussed problems facing the medical community and ways to move forward as a collective effort, as did administrators such as Francis Collins, MD, PhD, Director of the National Institutes of Health, and Margaret Hamburg, MD, Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration.

“We really have to figure out these creative ways to bring together what the private sector is dreaming of and what the academic and government sectors are dreaming of and make sure we’re not wasting a dollar in terms of how to make that come true,” Collins said.

Research!America received shout-outs from Research!America board member Ellen Sigal, PhD, Chairperson and Founder of Friends of Cancer Research and Garry Neil, MD, Corporate Vice President of the Corporate Office of Science and Technology at Johnson & Johnson.

“I want to talk a little bit about Research!America and the doubling of the NIH,” Sigal said. “When we started all these efforts, we started out disease by disease.

But now by collaborating we were able to work together not fight the disease wars,” she added, speaking on the importance of the cooperative model which is currently missing from government.

The symposium is only the beginning of an extensive conversation and work to come.

“This meeting is breaking ground on one of the most important issues of our day—finding new, collaborative ways to get treatments and cures to patients faster,” said Lesa Mitchell, Vice President of advancing innovation at the Kauffman Foundation, according to the Kauffman foundation site page. “All the key players are talking to each other—be they researchers, patients, policymakers or disease philanthropies—and this is a giant step in the right direction.”

View Sebelius’ keynote address and panel discussions here.

The MRC Leads UK Research Efforts

Friday, June 11th, 2010

The World Cup, soccer’s equivalent of the Olympics, opened play on Friday in South Africa. The U.S. team’s first match comes Saturday against one of the premier names in international soccer: England.

In honor of the World Cup kickoff, we thought we’d turn the spotlight across the pond to the U.K.’s Medical Research Council. The MRC traces its roots to the National Insurance Act of 1911; a provision of that act took one penny per year from every working person to treat and study tuberculosis.

From there, the MRC grew into a research institute before becoming a corporation with its own Royal Charter. In 1918, the MRC declared that its decisions on the directions of its research would be independent of the U.K. government.

Per the MRC’s Royal Charter, the organization’s mission is to “encourage and support research to improve human health; produce skilled researchers; advance and disseminate knowledge and technology to improve the quality of life and economic competitiveness of the UK; [and] promote dialogue with the public about medical research.”

Sir John Chisholm, the chair, and Sir Leszek Borysiewicz, the chief executive, currently lead the MRC. Both men have extensive ties to science and research.

In 2008-09, the MRC spent 704 million pounds on research; 225 million pounds of that supported more than 400 grants to researchers and scientists. In 1999, MRC formed an affiliated company, MRC Technology, that helps bridge the gap between discovery and delivery to patients.

Kalil Advocates Expansion of CCC Research Agenda-Setting Model

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Tom Kalil, Deputy Director for Policy at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy wrote a blog post last week praising the Computing Community Consortium’s role in identifying and promoting Information Technology research innovation.

The CCC, a group founded in 2007 with National Science Foundation funding which spans across many research institutions and universities, was successful in influencing the 2008 administration’s budget and recruiting decisions. Kalil detailed this success along with the organization’s accomplishments in increasing collaboration among government, industry and academia. He attributed these successes the CCC’s short explanatory papers and roadmap workshopping techniques, and advocated expanding the CCC strategy for IT research to other areas of research as well.

Kalil said he believes applying CCC models to new disciplines such as clean energy, nanoscale science and engineering, and physical sciences and engineering will help reduce the time gap between high-impact research idea identification and embracing these ideas at the federal level.

Of the CCC models, Kalil said “They would undoubtedly strengthen the ability of the United States to identify and support transformative research.”

Alzheimer’s Association Study Reveals Economic Incentives to Support Research

Friday, June 4th, 2010

The Alzheimer’s Association recently released a report (PDF) outlining the high costs of Alzheimer’s disease to the American economy and the savings new treatments would realize.

As discussed in a newsletter from innovation.org, if the rate of Alzheimer’s case development continues at its current pace in adults age 65 and over, the number of patients with Alzheimer’s disease will more than double from 5.1 million to 13.5 million by 2050.

Alzheimer’s will cost the U.S. government $1 trillion per year by 2050, a total of $20 trillion in the next 40 years. This represents a 600% spending increase to Medicare and a 400% spending increase to Medicaid, other payers and patients.

Greater investment in Alzheimer’s research could greatly reduce these long-term costs. A new treatment, which delays the onset of Alzheimer’s by five years, could reduce the number of cases by 43%, saving the U.S. $447 billion by 2030. If a treatment that slows the progression of Alzheimer’s by five years were developed, it could lower the number of patients in the severe stage of Alzheimer’s by more than 80%. This reduction would save the government $197 billion by 2050.

The failure of the Alzheimer’s trial drug latrepirdine, which previously held so much promise, in March further emphasizes the need to increase funding for many clinical trials, since a new drug takes 10-15 years and $1.3 billion to develop.

APHA Urges Advocacy for CDC Funding Levels

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

The American Public Health Association is urging its supporters to contact their Senators and Representatives to endorse an $8.8 billion funding level for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

APHA’s website has a letter that can be sent electronically to your Member of the House and both Senators.

While the budget resolution passed by the Senate Budget Committee contains a small increase for discretionary spending for federal health programs, as well as subsequent cuts through FY 2013, APHA is urging its supporters to tell their elected officials to fund these federal health programs at the highest possible levels.

More information about the call to action is available on APHA’s website. For more information on CDC funding levels, visit the Campaign for Public Health’s website.

Multi-agency venture to quantify medical funding outcomes

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

The National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy will lead an initiative to establish and monitor the effects of federal science investment on society.

This two-phase program, known as Science and Technology for America’s Reinvestment: Measuring the Effect of Research on Innovation, Competitiveness and Science, or STAR METRICS, will utilize research institutions among other resources to calculate and monitor the effects of science spending on employment and four key areas of society: economic growth, workforce outcomes, scientific knowledge and the social sphere.

NSF Director Arden L. Bement Jr., PhD, said the role of universities in the STAR METRICS program will greatly enhance collaboration between science agencies and the research community in describing and assessing the impacts of federal investments in science and engineering research and education.

The NSF and NIH have committed a combined $1 million to the program’s first year. NIH Director Francis S. Collins, MD, PhD, told NIH News he sees great potential for the findings of this initiative, both in the short-term impact on jobs and the long-term impact of patents, publications, citations and business start-ups.

John P. Holdren, PhD, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and Director of the White House OSTP, emphasized the importance of hard data in the assessment of the value of medical spending.

“It is essential to document with solid evidence the returns our nation is obtaining from its investment in research and development,” Holdren said. “STAR METRICS is an important element of doing just that.”

Read the original NIH News article here.

Urge Your Senators to Support $35 Billion for NIH in FY 2011

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) is inviting his colleagues to join him on a letter to Appropriations Chair Daniel Inouye (D-HI) and Ranking Member Thad Cochran (R-MS) in support of $35 billion for the National Institutes of Health in FY 2011.

Please urge your Senators to sign this letter. Your members need to hear from you. A significant show of support from scientists, patients, health care providers and other research stakeholders is critical to Congress making research a funding priority in FY 2011. The deadline for Senators to sign-on is June 3. Take action now!

NatureNews: Changes in Congress Cloud Prospects for Funding

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

In yesterday’s NatureNews, the online version of the journal Nature, Research!America President Mary Woolley shares her thoughts on the future of medical research advocacy once Congressional champions including Rep. David Obey (D-WI) and Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) leave Congress at the end of this term.

Specter’s loss “is made even more important by Congressman Obey’s retirement and the loss of Senator Kennedy”, says Mary Woolley, president of Research!America, a medical-research advocacy group in Alexandria, Virginia. “We have a significant challenge ahead of us.”

“The science community is hearing a warning from members of Congress who have been our champions and are retiring or were defeated — that it is not stepping up to the plate, it’s not being heard at home in their districts or their states,” she says.

Read Meredith Wadman’s entire article online.

FasterCures Event Talks of Bridging the Gap

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

Robert J. Beall, PhD, recounted the joy of hearing a cystic fibrosis patient’s wedding plans this summer. Beall, the president and CEO of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, a Research!America member, remembers it wasn’t long ago when CF patients weren’t expected to live long enough to attend elementary school.

But the strides made in identifying the root cause and finding a treatment for cystic fibrosis. Beall believes his organization’s success has created a “road map” for finding treatment for other rare diseases — “from test tube to bedside,” Beall said — and he outlined that map a briefing in the Senate last week. The briefing was held by FasterCures, also a Research!America member.

The process started with identifying the differences between a normal lung and a lung from a person afflicted with cystic fibrosis. Research led them to a hypothesis: Chlorides weren’t exiting the lung cells properly, though sodium was able to pass through normally. The result was a backup of material in the cell — “like a salt shaker,” Beall said — which in turned caused the cilia not to funcion properly.

After finding out what the problem was, the next step was to understand why the problem was occurring. The answer came in 1989 when a team of researchers (including Francis S. Collins, MD, PhD, now the director of the National Institutes of Health who had also worked on cystic fibrosis research at the University of Michigan) discovered the gene that led to cystic fibrosis.

Discovering the gene offered the chance to perform animal models, implement new screening programs and perform further research on gene therapy. And the discovery came at an opportune time; Beall said the research had been stalled for some time prior to the discovery of the gene.

With a therapeutic option in hand, the next step was finding a compound that would allow for the normal movement of chlorides outside of the cell. Relying on the normal model of academic research would’ve meant allowing two or three days to test only a handful of options.

“We had to look to industry,” Beall said.

And this was where the process reached a critical point. The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation entered into a $40 million contract with a San Diego-based firm that could test tens of thousands of compounds per day. The hope was that, once a compound was identified, the information could be sold for further development.

Indeed, it was.

“How could we incentivize them?” Beall said. “Take away their risk.”

But by taking away private industry’s risk, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation took on significant risk of its own.

“We paid $40 million for one shot on goal,” he said. “We could’ve failed.”

Instead, they succeeded. The process yielded two compounds — VX70 and VX809 — that treated the basic defect of cystic fibrosis. A third compound, VX770, is now in the third stage of clinical trials, and as many as 30 other drugs are in the development pipeline.

Beall urged other groups to take the risk as well, believing the risk could pay off.

The Coming Cliff at NIH

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

The National Institutes of Health were given $8 billion by President Barack Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Much of that money funded two-year grants, and Science magazine discovered worry among researchers about what will happen once that money dries up.

“Much of the work recently begun will be left short of cash,” reporter Jocelyn Kaiser wrote (registration required). “The result could be the lowest grant funding rates in NIH history, and the academic job market will suddenly dry up — especially for young researchers.”

Some grant applications will go unfunded; NIH expects it will fund more than 4,000 fewer grants than it could with the stimulus money. But the exact number of grants NIH can and can’t fund won’t be known until Obama submits his final budget; an increase in budget funding could save some of the grants that would otherwise be lost.

Many groups, including Research!America, believe NIH’s funding should be increased. Research!America believes the organization should have a $35 billion budget, an increase of 13.5% over its current funding; Science made note of this in its story. Others believe the funding should be higher: the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology ($37 billion) and Sen. Arlen Specter, D-PA ($40 billion).

A recent meeting of economists, academics and NIH leaders at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island tried to develop solutions to the potential funding cliff. One proposal: Get Congress to authorize one-time “bridge” fellowships, which would give more time to allow some of those employed with stimulus funds to find new work or a new career altogether.

“It wouldn’t take a whole lot of money,” Richard Freeman, a Harvard labor economist and the meeting’s organizer, told the magazine.

The Scientist: Specter Faces Tough Reelection Battle

Monday, May 17th, 2010

Research!America board member Ellen Sigal, PhD, chair and founder of Friends of Cancer Research, is quoted today along with Research!America President Mary Woolley in an article by Bob Grant on The Scientist online about the implications for research in tomorrow’s Pennsylvania Democratic Senate primary between candidates Senator Arlen Specter and Congressman Joe Sestak.

…”Absent my push I think there’s no doubt the [federal research] funding would go way down,” Specter told The Scientist.

Research advocates are concerned that Specter might be right. Mary Woolley, the president of Research!America, points out that there’s been a recent loss of support for research on Capitol Hill, with Senator Edward Kennedy’s death last year and the upcoming retirement of Representative David Obey. “The strong champions for research for health are very few in number in the Senate right now, and really Senator Specter is critical in that regard,” Woolley said.

Read the entire blog post.

Sebellius Announces NIH Recovery Act Construction Awards

Friday, May 14th, 2010

Today Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced $1 billion in National Institutes of Health awards to construct or improve biomedical research facilities. The grants, funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and administered by NIH’s National Center for Research Resources, are expected to create and sustain jobs while advancing research nationwide.

A total of 146 grants to institutions in 44 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico were awarded to upgrade and construct buildings, laboratory spaces and core facilities that are crucial to biomedical and behavioral investigators.

“This unprecedented Recovery Act investment in research facility construction will not only give our world-class scientists the modern facilities they need for impact research, it will also help create and maintain jobs in varied business sectors and in all regions of our country,” said Secretary Sebelius.

These awards are part of an overall $100 billion federal government investment in science, innovation and technology the Administration is making through the Recovery Act to spur domestic job creation in emerging industries and create a long-term foundation for economic growth.

More information about NCRR’s Recovery Act grants can be found at www.ncrr.nih.gov/recovery/construction.

Use Research!America’s NIH ARRA funding by state tool to find out what types of projects NIH is funding in your state and district.

CNN Health: Scientist Taught the World to Get the Lead Out

Friday, May 14th, 2010

A great story about Centers for Disease Control and Prevention research appeared on CNN.com yesterday. The story focuses on Dr. Phillip Landrigan’s research in the 1970s about subtle aspects of chronic lead poisoning.

[Lead poisoning] research reverberated through the medical establishment and influenced policymakers in the nation’s capital.

In 1973, the Environmental Protection Agency issued new regulations phasing lead out of gasoline. Lead had been used as an additive designed to improve engine performance, and at the time, car emissions produced 200,000 tons of lead a year.

In 1978, the Consumer Product Safety Commission banned lead-based paint.

Since then, the percentage of children aged 1 to 5 with what the CDC considers dangerously high levels of lead in their blood has declined from 77.8 percent to 1.6 percent, according to the most recent figures available.

Stories about research successes like Dr. Landrigan’s are important for making the case for more funding for research to improve health. Share your stories of research success. We’d love to hear from you.

SSTI Weekly: Bioscience Job Growth

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

The U.S. bioscience industry continued to score employment gains through 2008 — the first year of the recent economic downturn, according to a study Battelle/BIO State Bioscience Initiatives 2010 released by Battelle and the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO).

While overall employment fell by 0.7 percent in 2008, U.S. bioscience employment grew 1.4 percent.

Between 2001 and 2008, bioscience employment grew 15.8 percent, 4.5 times more than the overall economy. Bioscience wages also are outpacing national private sector wage growth.

BIO is a Research!America member.

Benchfly.com Microgrant Winners Announced

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

In March we wrote about Benchfly.com’s fundraising tool, Search For Research™. The first microgrant recipients have been announced. The winners were chosen by Search for Research™ toolbar users’ votes. The winning research projects:

Resurrecting a Fossil: A Window on Evolution (Tim Williams)
Isoetes is an ancient plant, descended from the Earth’s first giant trees around 420 million years ago. These trees reached 180 feet in just a few years, capturing a huge amount of CO2 and forming much of the present-day coal. Modern Isoetes have a defect in growth regulation keeping them very short. By understanding how Isoetes works, we can learn a lot about early plant evolution, and we may even be able to restore these amazing trees. This grant will help establish a controlled population Isoetes and will offset the material cost of the research.

Super-Potatoes!!! (Sergio Diez-de-Medina)
Potato is one of the most important crops included in human diet. Worldwide the production of potatoes is affected by several pathogens, been one of the most devastating Phytophtora infestans, which caused in 19th century the great irish famine. Nowadays this pathogen is still an issue due to its complexity. Lately has been identified chilean potato varieties that are substancially resistant to highly aggresive Phytophtora isolates. A Benchfly microgrant will be very useful to buy materials to identify the molecular reasons of the natural resistance in these chilean “super potatoes.”

Read interviews with the grant recipients and learn more about the project. Download the toolbar to help raise funds for future research!

Here’s a video about how the toolbar works:

Answers to America’s Health Concerns through Global Health Research

Wednesday, May 12th, 2010

“Looking through a global health lens, we are able to uncover disease in the U.S.,” said Peter Hotez, MD, PhD, of the Sabin Institute, at the May 7 Capitol Hill briefing, Lessons Learned Through Global Health R&D—What’s in it for the U.S. and Our Health Care System.

Group Shot /><p class=Karen A. Goraleski; Cyril Enwonwu, ScD, PhD, MDS; Jim Kazura, MD; Sten Vermund, MD, PhD; Antonina King, Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health; Peter J. Hotez, MD, PhD; Kadrieh Abou Shehadeh, Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health

The briefing, hosted in partnership with Research!America member, The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, and sponsored by the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health, Chairman Donald Payne (D-NJ) and Rep. Brian Bilbray (R-CA) showcased the bipartisan nature of research for health and illustrated how the U.S. investment in global health research offers the opportunity to think about U.S. health care in new ways.

Additional presenters Cyril Enwonwu, ScD, PhD, MDS, University of Maryland School of Dentistry; Jim Kazura, MD, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; and Sten Vermund, MD, PhD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, cited specific examples from their global health research that demonstrated how the U.S. is incorporating lessons for the benefit of Americans’ health as well as those outside the U.S.

Hotez drew on lessons learned from neglected tropical disease research (also known as diseases of poverty) and asthma in developing countries that has shed light on the existence and contribution of these diseases to developmental delays, poverty and illness in concentrated pockets throughout the U.S. In addition to the hidden burden of disease, this global health research has also allowed us to study transmission of these diseases within and among our own communities.

Enwonwu discussed the importance of our investment from the point of his research in malnutrition, which includes obesity, a serious problem afflicting urban areas around the world as lifestyles become more sedentary and diets shift. As with the underfed, the immunity of those overfed are also compromised, leading to nutrition-related chronic diseases, diabetes, oral complications and the two-way traffic of poverty and ill health, affecting development of humans even while they are still in the mother’s womb.

Kazura offered the value of our investment in global health research across many sectors, both in the crippling effects malaria has on our military and business and vacation travelers abroad, as well as the economic impact of potential biological warfare in viruses like Rift Valley Fever, which can easily penetrate into our food chain and has the potential to shut down the livestock industry as well as domestic and foreign trade. He also shared important research findings from abroad that help us understand why our allergies are increasing in this country and how our immune systems are reacting in our continually advancing world.

Vermund showcased the value of a global health research program that is able to track six times the number of people in a China-U.S. synergistic program than if the research program had only been able to study American populations, yielding valuable trend and individual data that is informing breast cancer developments and potentially other health findings for Americans. “Global health research is studying Americans’ roots — we are much more diverse than anyone ever acknowledged, even as individuals. The return to the American economy is great; we pay money to get more and that’s why funding global health research is truly an investment in our future.”

Room Shot

CF Foundation and FasterCures Hill Briefing on May 20

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and FasterCures will present a Capitol Hill briefing, Leveraging Federal Investment to Speed the Development of Promising Therapies for Patients, on Thursday May 20 to spotlight the nation’s investment in medical research at the National Institutes of Health and examines how these dollars can be leveraged to create new therapies for patients and save lives.

NIH Director Francis S. Collins, Dr. Robert J. Beall of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and Margaret Anderson of FasterCures will address:

* What lessons can be learned from the cystic fibrosis successes that can map the way for other diseases?
* How can federal investment at the NIH and other agencies be leveraged to answer important scientific questions in a way that accelerates the discovery and development of medical solutions for deadly and debilitating diseases?
* How can we bridge the “Valley of Death” between basic science discoveries and the creation of new therapies for patients?

Find out more on the FasterCures website, and to RSVP e-mail abouselli@fastercures.org by Monday, May 17.