The sequester’s a public health hazard

rablogs

Excerpt of an op-ed by columnist George F. Will, published in The Washington Post.

’€œThe capacity to blunder slightly is the real marvel of DNA. Without this special attribute, we would still be anaerobic bacteria and there would be no music.’€

’€” Lewis Thomasgeorge_will

The pedigree of human beings, Thomas wrote, probably traces to a single cell fertilized by a lightning bolt as the Earth was cooling. Fortunately, genetic ’€œmistakes’€ ’€” mutations ’€” eventually made us. But they also have made illnesses. Almost all diseases arise from some combination of environmental exposures and genetic blunders in the working of DNA. Breast cancer is a family of genetic mutations.

The great secret of doctors, wrote Thomas ’€” who was a physician, philosopher and head of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center ’€” ’€œis that most things get better by themselves; most things, in fact, are better in the morning.’€ But many things require intelligent interventions ’€” cures. So, to see the federal government at its best, and sequester-driven spending cuts at their worst, visit the 322 acres where 25,000 people work for the National Institutes of Health.

This 60th anniversary of the Clinical Center, the NIH’€™s beating heart, is inspiriting and depressing: Public health is being enhanced ’€” rapidly, yet unnecessarily slowly ’€” by NIH-supported research here, and in hundreds of institutions across the country, into new drugs, devices and treatments. Yet much research proposed by extraordinarily talented physicians and scientists cannot proceed because the required funding is prevented by the intentional irrationality by which the sequester is administered.

A 2’€‰percent reduction of federal spending would be easily manageable. It has, however, been made deliberately dumb by mandatory administrative rigidities intended to maximize pain in order to weaken resistance to any spending restraint. Spending on basic medical research is being starved as the river of agriculture subsidies rolls on.

For Francis Collins, being the NIH’€™s director is a daily experience of exhilaration and dismay. In the past 40’€‰years, he says, heart attacks and strokes have declined 60’€‰percent and 70’€‰percent, respectively. Cancer deaths are down 15’€‰percent in 15’€‰years. An AIDS diagnosis is no longer a death sentence. Researchers are on the trail of a universal flu vaccine, based on new understandings of the influenza virus and the human immune system. Chemotherapy was invented here ’€” and it is being replaced by treatments developed here. Yet the pace of public health advances, Collins says, is being slowed by the sequester.

He entered federal service to oversee decoding of the human genome, which he describes as ’€œreading out the instruction book for human beings.’€ We are, he says, at the dawn of the era of ’€œprecision medicine,’€ of treatments personalized for patients’€™ genetic makeups.

This will be, Collins believes, ’€œthe century of biology.’€ Other countries have ’€œread our playbook,’€ seeing how biomedical research can reduce health costs, produce jobs and enhance competitiveness. Meanwhile, America’€™s great research universities award advanced degrees to young scientists from abroad, and then irrational immigration policy compels them to leave and add value to other countries. And now the sequester discourages and disperses scientific talent.

Read the full op-ed here.

 

Post ID: 
1478

Add comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Adds node titles to internal links found in content (as HTML "title" attribute).
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
We have health challenges in this country that science will provide answers for if given the chance and we haven't given science that opportunity
Mary Woolley, President and CEO, Research!America