Sample Letter to the Editor
Writing a letter to the editor of a local or national newspaper or magazine in response to a recent article is an effective way to make your voice heard.
There’s no guarantee that your letter will be published, but there’s a sure-fire way that it won’t be: if you don’t write it. So, when you see an article about research or funding and have something to say, write it quickly and send it to the editors of your local media outlet.
Editors Can’t Publish Letters They Don’t Receive
The newspaper or magazine’s website and editorial page should have contact information and guidelines for how to submit a letter. The New York Times’ letters editor has written a tip sheet (subscription required) for ways to make your letter more publishable, offering advice that applies to most publications. In general, keep your letter short, include your full contact information, submit it soon after the original article—ideally within 24 hours—and make one point, clearly and with conviction.
No-cost, accessible science communications resources for writing letters to the editor include this webpage from the Coalition for the Life Sciences, as well as this toolkit (PDF) from the American Geophysical Union.
Sample Letter to the Editor
This letter was published in The New York Times to make the case for continued, bipartisan support for the NIH.
To the Editor:
Re “Long Government’s ‘Crown Jewel,’ Health Institute Is Becoming a Target” (news article, Dec. 3):
Your article describes the National Institutes of Health as a “crown jewel” of the federal government based on its track record of success in driving medical and health research and innovation. The article also captures the longstanding bipartisan support for the agency and its work.
When asked in a national survey we commissioned this year, Americans of all political persuasions expressed their support for federally funded research:
Eighty-eight percent of Americans agree that basic scientific research is necessary and should be supported by the federal government.
Some 62 percent would be willing to pay $1 per week more in taxes to support additional medical and health research.
And 89 percent say it is important that the U.S. is a global leader in research to improve health.
Continuing to treat the N.I.H. as a top national priority is a strategy that will spur new treatments and cures for the health threats facing our population. It will also drive U.S. business and job growth across the life science, technology, manufacturing and service sectors that in the end will keep us globally competitive.
Mary Woolley
New York
The writer is the president and C.E.O. of Research!America.